\n<\/p>\n
Democrats and the legacy media have been spinning since the very beginning of President Donald Trump\u2019s military actions against the Iranian regime. Over the span of two weeks, they have pulled out all the stops to win the battle of narratives and convince the world that it was wrong to strike Iran \u2014 or if it was right to strike Iran, this was the wrong time. And if it was the right time to strike Iran, then Trump is doing it wrong.<\/p>\n
For those who don\u2019t spend their Sunday mornings glued to the television \u2014 and their Sunday afternoons attempting to dig through a week\u2019s worth of network and cable news media spin \u2014 The Daily Wire has compiled a short summary of what you may have missed.<\/p>\n
On ABC News, for example, Martha Raddatz spoke with Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA). He agreed that Iran was \u201ca problem,\u201d but immediately pivoted to argue that \u201cwar\u201d was not the proper response to every problem. He then went on to draw a comparison between Iran and previous military actions in Libya, Iraq, and Afghanistan \u2014 and he argued that they were all essentially the same.<\/p>\n
\u201cYes, Iran is a problem. A problem that needs to be contained. But what we should have learned from Muammar Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein and the Taliban is, you can have a threat and not have a military solution that\u2019s going to make it better.\u201d<\/p>\n
\nBREAKING: Rep. Adam Smith tells Martha Raddatz that \u201cwar is not always the answer to a problem.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cYes, Iran is a problem. A problem that needs to be contained. But what we should have learned from Muammar Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein and the Taliban\u2026 pic.twitter.com\/C5oi0rvSQy<\/a><\/p>\n
\u2014 Axel Vesa (@AxelVesa1) March 15, 2026<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Smith also offered a comparison to Venezuela and the recent operation to extract former President Nicol\u00e1s Maduro, adding, \u201cIran is not Venezuela. We can\u2019t just fly in, snatch the president and make things change.\u201d<\/p>\n
\nRep. Adam Smith on President Trump\u2019s foreign policy: \u201cIran is not Venezuela. We can\u2019t just fly in, snatch the president and make things change.\u201d https:\/\/t.co\/LLgvsyy61S<\/a> pic.twitter.com\/ns5XiVOxU0<\/a><\/p>\n
\u2014 This Week (@ThisWeekABC) March 15, 2026<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
On CNN\u2019s \u201cState of the Union,\u201d anchor Jake Tapper brought in former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, who promptly declared that the action in Iran was proof that \u201cthis is clearly amateur hour at the Pentagon and in the White House.\u201d<\/p>\n
Buttigieg, after claiming that former Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden had secured nuclear deals that prevented Iran from gaining access to nuclear weapons, argued that President Trump had rushed into war because he was unable to get \u201ca better deal\u201d and had done so without any kind of planning or preparation.<\/p>\n
\nPete Buttigieg on the war with Iran: \u201cThis is clearly amateur hour at the Pentagon and in the White House\u201d pic.twitter.com\/liOQlGQ50w<\/a><\/p>\n
\u2014 State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) March 15, 2026<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Tapper took a pause to defend the media\u2019s oppositional stance, arguing that he and others doing the same were not being critical because they wanted the United States to lose, but because they were just doing their jobs.<\/p>\n
\u201cEvery reporter that I know wants the United States to succeed in every way, and the way that reporters help that happen is by asking questions of people in power and not blindly cheering on leaders who take the nation to war,\u201d he claimed.<\/p>\n
\nTAPPER: \u201cEvery reporter that I know wants the United States to succeed in every way, and the way that reporters help that happen is by asking questions of people in power and not blindly cheering on leaders who take the nation to war.\u201d pic.twitter.com\/KtfZYSnBJU<\/a><\/p>\n
\u2014 State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) March 15, 2026<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Margaret Brennan, on \u201cFace the Nation,\u201d spoke to several who reinforced the Democrat-driven narrative that the Trump administration was in over its head in Iran.<\/p>\n
Former CIA operative Joey Gannon told her that Iran had moved to keep supreme leadership in the Khamenei family because it sent a signal to the world that the regime still had complete control.<\/p>\n
\u201cSo, he was a gatekeeper for the supreme leader\u2019s office in the past. He has strong ties to the IRGC and the Basij, he knows how power actually operates, and he is, effectively, a symbol of continuity right now,\u201d he explained.<\/p>\n
\nFormer CIA operative Jonny Gannon says the decision to appoint Motjaba Khameini as the new supreme leader \u201cis the message from the regime that they are still in control.\u201d<\/p>\n
Mojtaba Khamenei is clearly not a charming public face; what he is is a systems operator,\u201d he says. \u201cSo, he\u2026 pic.twitter.com\/oP6zveXtvO<\/a><\/p>\n
\u2014 Face The Nation (@FaceTheNation) March 15, 2026<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Samantha Vinograd, an Obama administration alum, took the same posture when she argued that Iran was essentially outwitting the United States strategically.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe Iranian regime has demonstrated an incredible capacity to be flexible and adaptive,\u201d she said, adding, \u201cThey played a long game here. They have invested in propaganda and tools in this country, as well as hiring people to do their dirty work for them, to such an extent that I am concerned that they have the intent and capability to, if not direct attacks here in the homeland, to inspire them .\u201d<\/p>\n
\nFormer Homeland Security official Samantha Vinograd says \u201cthe Iranian regime has demonstrated an incredible capacity to be flexible and adaptive\u201d in the way they carry out attacks.<\/p>\n
\u201cThey played a long game here. They have invested in propaganda and tools in this country, as\u2026 pic.twitter.com\/GgKqrE9CEG<\/a><\/p>\n
\u2014 Face The Nation (@FaceTheNation) March 15, 2026<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Senator Mark Warner (D-VA) told Brennan that he did not believe the Iranian regime \u2014 despite a 47-year record of Iran and its proxies killing over 1,000 American service members and civilians and a recent boast that the regime had nearly enough enriched uranium for almost a dozen nuclear bombs \u2014 posed an \u201cimminent threat\u201d to the United States. What\u2019s more, Warner argued that Iran did not pose an immediate threat to Israel \u2014 despite Iranian proxies in Hamas and Hezbollah striking Israeli targets on a regular basis.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere was no imminent threat to the United States, and I don\u2019t believe there was even an imminent threat to Israel from Iran,\u201d Warner declared. \u201cOver a period of time, particularly with the ballistic missile capability, Israel would be more under threat. The decision to go to war in this case was a choice by President Trump.\u201d<\/p>\n
\nSen. Mark Warner (D-VA) says he stands by the 2025 Annual Threat Assessment by U.S. intelligence leaders who testified at the time that Iran had not reauthorized their nuclear weapons program.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere was no imminent threat to the United States, and I don\u2019t believe there was\u2026 pic.twitter.com\/MLJA4YT5Gc<\/a><\/p>\n
\u2014 Face The Nation (@FaceTheNation) March 15, 2026<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n