There are only so many ways Democrats can spell out, in the most explicit possible terms, what they plan to do if and when they retake control of the federal government. They\u2019ve spent the last year celebrating the murder of conservatives, raising hell over the most basic voter-ID laws imaginable, and most recently, sabotaging the nation\u2019s airports in order to prevent ICE from doing its job \u2014 a plan that may very well work, given that Republicans seem <\/span>interested<\/span><\/a> in caving at the moment, once again. In short, Democrats are preparing a government that would treat Americans as foreigners in their own country.<\/span><\/p>\n But just in case their plan somehow wasn\u2019t obvious, here\u2019s Senator Chris Murphy, the Democrat from Connecticut, to spell it out.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Listen carefully to his answer here:<\/span><\/p>\n Senator Chris Murphy: \u201cThe people we care about most, the undocumented migrants\u201d<\/p>\n He actually said that<\/p>\n pic.twitter.com\/FsEPmWs81U<\/a><\/p>\n \u2014 End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) March 24, 2026<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Source: MS NOW\/EndWokeness\/X.com<\/p>\n It\u2019s the \u201cundocumented Americans\u201d that Democrats \u201ccare about most,\u201d according to Chris Murphy. Yes, \u201cundocumented Americans.\u201d Simply by virtue of entering this country \u2014 illegally, in almost every case \u2014 these people become Americans, according to one of the leaders of the Democrat Party. And more than that \u2014 they become the most important Americans of all. Democrats will prioritize their interests over the interests of you and your family. And they won\u2019t even pretend otherwise.<\/span><\/p>\n That interview aired in the final months of Joe Biden\u2019s presidency. It\u2019s only recently surfaced on social media, and for good reason. Democrats are now clearly preparing to wage an all-out war on Americans if they retake Congress and the White House. They\u2019re planning a campaign of retribution against conservatives that will make the Biden years look tame by comparison.<\/span><\/p>\n This isn\u2019t a guess. They\u2019re saying it openly, in a variety of different contexts.<\/span><\/p>\n In some cases, they\u2019re rewriting history to justify the purge that they\u2019re planning. Now, it probably won\u2019t come as a surprise to anyone to hear that I believe it\u2019s very important to study history \u2014 not the propaganda you\u2019re taught in public schools, but actual history. <\/span>We talk about various historical topics on the show all the time. I also have another monthly show, \u201cReal History,\u201d on Daily Wire. And there are a few reasons for this. First of all, it\u2019s interesting, as a factual matter. Secondly, as the famous quote goes, \u201cthose who are ignorant of history are doomed to repeat it.\u201d On top of that, if you\u2019re familiar with American history, then it\u2019s easier to spot political propaganda, particularly from the Left \u2014 which has committed itself to rewriting the past. It\u2019s also easier to see through this propaganda and determine what the Left is really after.<\/span><\/p>\n So here\u2019s a very transparent example of what this means, in practice. Late last week, The New Republic \u2014 which is one of those outlets on the Left that claims to be highly intellectual, like the Atlantic \u2014 outlined an elaborate plan to harass and imprison Donald Trump and his advisers, once Trump leaves office. This is the Left\u2019s new-and-improved game plan for a new wave of lawfare against Donald Trump. Instead of talking about ways to improve the lives of American citizens, they\u2019re still fixated on retribution.<\/span><\/p>\n The article is <\/span>entitled<\/span><\/a>, \u201cThere Will Be No Post-Presidential Peace for Donald Trump.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n For the most part, the article feels like it could\u2019ve been written ten years ago, except for the fact that it drops the whole Russian collusion hoax, which is too embarrassing for Democrats to talk about anymore. (That\u2019s why no one on the left mourned Robert Mueller, by the way; he was their hero when they thought he was useful to them, but when he failed to take down Trump, they completely forgot he existed). But the author of the New Republic article does mention the infamous \u201cEmoluments Clause,\u201d which used to be all the rage on the Left, as you may remember. He also drones on about \u201cinternational law\u201d as if it\u2019s a real thing. He suggests that government attorneys should be disbarred if they worked for the Trump administration. And there\u2019s even the suggestion that ICE officers should be punished in a future administration, for the crime of doing their jobs.<\/span><\/p>\n But the best paragraph of all, for my money, is this one. Again, this was <\/span>published<\/span><\/a> in The New Republic, which is allegedly an award-winning magazine on the Left.<\/span><\/p>\n A rundown of the Trump administration\u2019s scandals and crimes resembles, with shocking likeness, the grave, sweeping charges laid out in the Declaration of Independence against the last American king. \u201cHe has excited domestic insurrections against us,\u201d the Founding Fathers wrote about George III in 1776. Is there any better way of describing Trump\u2019s actions on January 6, 2021? He supported a violent mob aiming to overthrow the government; he maintains a similar disrespect for the institutions of American democracy to this day.<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n If you have no familiarity with American history, then this paragraph might make some degree of sense. After all, the Declaration of Independence condemned the British King for causing \u201cdomestic insurrections.\u201d And according to The New Republic, Donald Trump basically committed an insurrection as well because he delivered a speech. Therefore, we can conclude that the Founders themselves would have endorsed a campaign of violent payback against the Trump administration.<\/span><\/p>\n The main problem with this argument becomes very clear when you take a look at what the Founders were talking about when they referred to \u201cdomestic insurrections.\u201d Contrary to what modern Leftists believe, the Founders were not attacking King George for delivering a speech to his followers, in which he urged his followers to \u201cpeacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.\u201d <\/span><\/p>\n Instead, the Founders were attacking King George \u2014 and other British officials \u2014 for encouraging slave revolts in the colonies. In particular, the colonists were furious over Lord Dunmore\u2019s Proclamation in 1775, which was issued by the British officer as the colonists were becoming increasingly frustrated with British rule. Lord Dunmore declared martial law and promised freedom to every slave (or indentured servant) who ran away from his owner and joined the British Army. By some estimates, thousands of slaves took Dunmore up on that offer. It was, in the literal sense, a domestic insurrection. It was nothing like what Donald Trump did on January 6.<\/span><\/p>\n So take a moment to appreciate the irony here. In order to construct an extremely convoluted plan to \u201cget Donald Trump,\u201d the so-called \u201cthought leaders\u201d on the Left are now taking the side of the American colonists who were upset that the British government was encouraging slaves to run away and become free. Put another way, in order to \u201cdefeat the MAGA movement\u201d once and for all, they\u2019re saying that Donald Trump\u2019s actions on January 6 are the moral and legal equivalent of telling black slaves that they should run away and become free. But they don\u2019t actually realize they\u2019re saying any of this, because they don\u2019t understand American history. They certainly don\u2019t care about what the Founders said or what they believed. Their only objective, as always, is to destroy their political opponents. And they will lie about anything in order to achieve that objective. If you spend any amount of time studying history, it becomes very obvious that they do this all the time. And if your children are in public schools, the same thing is happening there.<\/span><\/p>\n What we\u2019re witnessing here is the launch of what Democrats are calling \u201cProject 2029,\u201d after the infamous Project 2025 that became an instant obsession on the Left.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n But there\u2019s a big difference between Project 2025 and Project 2029. The former was a policy document from a conservative think tank, which discussed plans to roll back taxes, promote the nuclear family, and eliminate propaganda from public schools. Democrats pretended that Project 2025 was our nefarious plan to do horrible things to them, but it was actually a pretty standard document. By contrast, Project 2029 is explicitly a plan to imprison and bankrupt Donald Trump and everyone who works for him (or supports him). So once again, Democrats were projecting, in other words. They\u2019re doing exactly what they claimed that the Right was doing.<\/span><\/p>\n Here\u2019s the governor of Illinois, who\u2019s now on Ozempic, apparently, to explain:<\/span><\/p>\n Democratic Illinois Governor JB Pritzker speaks about a Democratic \u201cProject 2029\u201d in which members of the current Trump administration, along with federal agents, will be criminally and civilly prosecuted.<\/p>\n \u201cWhatever it is that we can do. It may be that you cannot criminally\u2026 pic.twitter.com\/0bj1dVyUyf<\/a><\/p>\n \u2014 AF Post (@AFpost) March 19, 2026<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Source: @AFpost\/X.com<\/p>\n The New York Times woman with the tie is eager to hear that federal agents will be \u201ccriminally prosecuted\u201d \u2014 for what, exactly? They don\u2019t say. When the Russiagate hoax was in full swing, they at least had some kind of fake criminal charges in mind \u2014 like \u201cobstruction of justice\u201d or something like that. But now they don\u2019t even have that.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Think about how extraordinary that is. These people spent several years talking about prosecuting Donald Trump during his first term. Then Trump left office, and they followed through on their threats. They began several prosecutions against the former president in state and federal court. They didn\u2019t spend any amount of time thinking about what voters actually wanted, or how Donald Trump resonated with so many people. <\/span><\/p>\n Instead, they spent all of their creative energy bringing charges that made absolutely no sense \u2014 to the point that, when Donald Trump was convicted in New York, no sane person in the country even pretended to care. No matter how many times Kamala Harris read the script about Donald Trump being a \u201cconvicted felon,\u201d it didn\u2019t matter. And now, after all of that \u2014 after losing the presidency in large part because of their lawfare \u2014 they\u2019re not simply doubling down. They\u2019re openly admitting that, in their next campaign of retribution, they aren\u2019t even going to use a pretext. They\u2019re just going to throw people in prison \u2014 or worse.<\/span><\/p>\n About a year ago, I did a <\/span>monologue<\/span><\/a> on the rise of assassination culture in this country. We talked about how Democrats were trying to murder Elon Musk, how they celebrated the murder of a healthcare insurance CEO and glorified his killer, and how they threw money at a black teenager who was accused of murdering a white high school student at a track meet. <\/span><\/p>\n Charlie Kirk also talked about assassination culture on his show, back in April of 2025. In particular, Charlie cited a <\/span>report<\/span><\/a> from the Network Contagion Research Institute, or NCRI. They\u2019re a nonprofit based in New Jersey that focuses on analyzing threats on social media. And their report showed that, on the Left, a growing number of people weren\u2019t simply celebrating political violence. They were openly calling for it. That\u2019s why, according to U.S. Capitol Police data, threat investigations have more than doubled since 2017, from 4,000 per year to more than 9,400. (Of course, you don\u2019t really need a report for this \u2014 we all know it\u2019s true.)<\/span><\/p>\n Now, one year later, NCRI has updated its report. They ran a survey where they asked about 2,000 people to first provide their political ideology, and then to state whether they saw a justification for violence against certain political figures. NCRI then filtered out about 1,000 of those respondents because they finished the survey too quickly or failed various attention checks. (Which should tell you something about how unreliable polls tend to be.)<\/span><\/p>\n Here\u2019s what they\u2019ve <\/span>found<\/span><\/a>:\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Justification for the murder of Donald Trump has increased from NCRI\u2019s original study in April 2025, from 56% to 67% among Left-of-Center respondents. \u2026 This tolerance for violence appears to have grown on the right as well, with 54% of Right-of-Center respondents expressing justification for murdering New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani. \u2026 Support for political murder is associated with pessimistic assessments of America\u2019s trajectory. \u2026 Support for political murder is about 15% higher among females than among males. \u2026 Overall, nearly two-thirds of all respondents (66%) endorsed some level of justification for murdering either or both Zohran Mamdani and Donald Trump. \u2026 The broader pattern points to belief in American decline amplified by social media especially among youth as a central driver of this change.<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Here\u2019s the data on the people who want Trump dead, to give you an idea.<\/span><\/p>\n Source: Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n According to the chart, 67% of \u201cleft-of-center\u201d respondents gave \u201csome or more justification for murdering Donald Trump.\u201d 58% of \u201ccentrists\u201d did the same. And incredibly enough, 42% of \u201cright-of-center\u201d respondents gave a justification for killing Trump. The survey also found a strong correlation between justifying Trump\u2019s murder and Mamdani\u2019s murder, indicating a broader trend towards political violence in this country \u2014 one that\u2019s noticeably stronger on the Left, particularly among women who spend a lot of time on social media, and who perceive that America is on the decline.<\/span><\/p>\n It\u2019s mostly what you\u2019d expect \u2014 except perhaps for the fact that women are actually more likely than men to call for political violence. This is a finding that, if true, would obviously represent a major victory for the feminist movement. For generations, they\u2019ve sought to erase every feminine instinct and to replace those instincts with a crude knock-off of masculinity. And that appears to be what\u2019s happening. Women are now posting on social media and giving interviews in which they beat their chests about how bloodthirsty they are. It\u2019s almost as if feminism has made women much less happy and much less pleasant than they\u2019ve ever been at any other point in American history.<\/span><\/p>\n Watch:<\/span><\/p>\n POLITICAL VIOLENCE: This is where the Democrats and their willing accomplices in the drive-by media have led their constituents. The bloodlust is palpable. https:\/\/t.co\/uAepEC5yzx<\/a><\/p>\n \u2014 @amuse (@amuse) September 29, 2025<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Source: @amuse\/X.com<\/p>\n While several of the women in that clip obviously skew older, this trend isn\u2019t limited to the elderly. It\u2019s not simply a phenomenon in which old people are mouthing off. YouGov ran a similar survey, just two days after Charlie Kirk\u2019s murder. They asked, \u201cIs it ever justified for citizens to resort to violence in order to achieve political goals?\u201d <\/span><\/p>\n Here\u2019s what they found:<\/span><\/p>\n Source: YouGov\/The Economist<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Nearly one-third of self-described liberals, ages 18 to 39, answered yes. That\u2019s the highest of all the demographics they surveyed. <\/span><\/p>\n And again, you don\u2019t really need a survey to establish this. <\/span><\/p>\n You can just browse TikTok and look at videos like this one, with millions of views:<\/span><\/p>\n Unhinged tiktoker says he\u2019s declaring war on Republicans and Republicans deserve to be shot and die pic.twitter.com\/0UNvSRHQHZ<\/a><\/p>\n\n
![\"DailyWire+\"](\"https:\/\/dw-wp-production.imgix.net\/2025\/09\/Matt-watch-now-1-1024x171.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n\n
\n
\n
![\"Source:](\"https:\/\/dw-wp-production.imgix.net\/2026\/03\/NCRI-Graph-825x576.jpg\")
<\/p>\n\n
![\"Source:](\"https:\/\/dw-wp-production.imgix.net\/2026\/03\/Reckless-youth-poll.jpg\")
<\/p>\n\n