{"id":22310,"date":"2026-03-27T02:28:00","date_gmt":"2026-03-27T02:28:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/2026\/03\/27\/everything-in-society-has-been-feminized-and-its-been-a-total-disaster-heres-proof\/"},"modified":"2026-03-27T02:28:00","modified_gmt":"2026-03-27T02:28:00","slug":"everything-in-society-has-been-feminized-and-its-been-a-total-disaster-heres-proof","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/2026\/03\/27\/everything-in-society-has-been-feminized-and-its-been-a-total-disaster-heres-proof\/","title":{"rendered":"Everything In Society Has Been Feminized, And It\u2019s Been A Total Disaster. Here\u2019s Proof."},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div style=\"position:relative\" data-narration-container=\"true\">\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">Here\u2019s something you probably don\u2019t realize about how Hollywood works. I know I wasn\u2019t familiar with it. But it turns out that, for some of the biggest franchises in the industry, studios often sign \u201cuse-it-or-lose-it agreements.\u201d What this means is that they buy the rights to a franchise for a certain number of years. But if they fail to make any progress towards making a film after a while, then they run the risk of losing the rights entirely. So studios can\u2019t buy the rights to a major franchise, and then take a long time figuring out what kind of movie they\u2019re going to make. They\u2019re under pressure to produce content quickly. For \u201cSpider-Man,\u201d for example, Sony committed to begin production on new films within \u201c3 years and 9 months of their last release, and they must get it into theaters within 5 years and 9 months of their last release.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">This has been standard in the industry for a long time. The very first film adaptation of \u201cThe Hobbit\u201d was made in 1967. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">The film was just 12 minutes long, and was produced in less than a month.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><div class=\"youtube-embed\" data-video_id=\"UBnVL1Y2src\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"First Animated Hobbit - directed by Gene Deitch, produced by Rembrandt Films\" width=\"696\" height=\"522\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/UBnVL1Y2src?feature=oembed&#038;enablejsapi=1\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/div>\n<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">Source: RembrantFilms\/YouTube.com<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">You can see the quality of the animation, or lack thereof. It\u2019s really just a few drawings that the camera zooms in on. The only reason for the film\u2019s existence was to allow the producer to keep the license to \u201cThe Lord of the Rings,\u201d so that he could sell it back to the Tolkien estate for a $100,000 profit. So he scrambled to put together this atrocious production \u2014 where the One Ring doesn\u2019t even do anything, and the animation doesn\u2019t animate \u2014 in order to hold onto the rights. More recently, New Line Cinema acquired the rights to the film adaptations of \u201cThe Lord of the Rings\u201d \u2014 and it cost them a lot more than $100,000.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">But the same general rule applies to New Line Cinema: New Line is compelled to pump out new \u201cLord of the Rings\u201d content, or else they\u2019ll lose the deal. It doesn\u2019t matter how bad or pointless the content may be. They\u2019re contractually forced to have something in motion. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">That\u2019s why, in 2024, something called \u201cThe Lord of the Rings: The War of the Rohirrim\u201d was released. You\u2019ve probably never heard of this film. Apparently it was some kind of \u201canime.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_1067375\" style=\"width:394px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1067375\" class=\"size-large wp-image-1067375\" src=\"https:\/\/dw-wp-production.imgix.net\/2026\/03\/War-of-the-Rohirrim-384x576.jpg\" alt=\"Source: New Line Cinema\/Warner Bros. Animation.\" width=\"384\" height=\"576\" srcset=\"https:\/\/dw-wp-production.imgix.net\/2026\/03\/War-of-the-Rohirrim-384x576.jpg 384w, https:\/\/dw-wp-production.imgix.net\/2026\/03\/War-of-the-Rohirrim-200x300.jpg 200w, https:\/\/dw-wp-production.imgix.net\/2026\/03\/War-of-the-Rohirrim.jpg 452w\" sizes=\"auto,  (max-width: 384px) 100vw, 384px\"\/><\/p>\n<p id=\"caption-attachment-1067375\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Source: New Line Cinema\/Warner Bros. Animation.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">And as you can see from this poster, the protagonist was a woman \u2014 the \u201cfiercely independent daughter of the legendary King of Rohan.\u201d For obvious reasons, no one watched this film. No one liked it. It wasn\u2019t actually based on anything in the books. They took a no-name character from a footnote in an appendix of \u201cReturn of the King,\u201d and they made her the protagonist. And they wrote a script very quickly, too. According to <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/variety.com\/2024\/film\/news\/box-office-kraven-the-hunter-bombs-worst-start-sony-marvel-films-1236247536\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight:400\">Variety<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight:400\">, \u201cThe animated film was developed and fast-tracked to ensure that New Line Cinema didn\u2019t lose the film adaptation rights for Tolkien\u2019s novels while Jackson and the teams behind the \u2018Lord of the Rings\u2019 and \u2018Hobbit\u2019 trilogies were working on two new live-action films for 2026 and beyond.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">The first of those live-action films has been titled \u201cThe Hunt for Gollum.\u201d It\u2019s slated to come out next year. Everyone already knows it will be horrible, because it has no reason to exist. There\u2019s a reason Tolkien didn\u2019t devote much time to this particular series of events in the books \u2014 it\u2019s simply not that interesting. It\u2019s also a prequel with absolutely no stakes, because we all know how the story turns out. We know Gollum is captured and gets away, and then the next movie happens.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.dailywire.com\/episode\/ep-1757-the-matt-walsh-show?elementPosition=0&amp;row=0&amp;rowHeadline=Recent+Episodes&amp;rowType=Horizontal+Show+Episodes+Carousel\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-large wp-image-976065 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/dw-wp-production.imgix.net\/2025\/09\/Matt-watch-now-1-1024x171.jpg\" alt=\"DailyWire+\" width=\"1024\" height=\"171\" srcset=\"https:\/\/dw-wp-production.imgix.net\/2025\/09\/Matt-watch-now-1-1024x171.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/dw-wp-production.imgix.net\/2025\/09\/Matt-watch-now-1-300x50.jpg 300w, https:\/\/dw-wp-production.imgix.net\/2025\/09\/Matt-watch-now-1-768x128.jpg 768w, https:\/\/dw-wp-production.imgix.net\/2025\/09\/Matt-watch-now-1-1536x256.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/dw-wp-production.imgix.net\/2025\/09\/Matt-watch-now-1.jpg 1800w\" sizes=\"auto,  (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\"\/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">But they have to make \u201cThe Hunt for Gollum,\u201d or else they\u2019ll lose the movie rights. They\u2019re contractually obligated to pump this garbage out. They can\u2019t take ten years and come up with a compelling or interesting film. They have to produce it right now. And then once they\u2019re done with this one, they need to have a follow-up in the pipeline. The pace is relentless, by design. And here\u2019s the key point: While the studios would prefer that the movies do well, that\u2019s actually a secondary objective. Their primary goal is to simply get a movie out \u2014 any movie \u2014 so that they can hold onto the rights for as long as possible.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">And the so-called \u201ccreative team\u201d \u2014 the writers and the executives \u2014 understand that mandate very well. They know that, when executives are desperate for a film, it\u2019s extremely easy to inject obvious, lazy feminist propaganda into an established story. And that\u2019s exactly what\u2019s happening now to \u201cThe Lord of the Rings.\u201d It was evident in that atrocious \u201canime\u201d film that no one watched. And it\u2019s especially evident in the new \u201cLord of the Rings\u201d film that\u2019s going to be written primarily by Stephen Colbert and his nepo baby son. (Which \u2014 already \u2014 gives the game away. Colbert\u2019s only relevant experience for this gig is that he destroyed late-night television, which used to be a major part of American culture. And precisely because of that recent experience \u2014 not in spite of it \u2014 Colbert has been brought onboard to obliterate the relevance of \u201cLord of the Rings,\u201d one of the great landmarks in Western literature). <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">Watch:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">\ud83d\udea8 BREAKING NEWS \ud83d\udea8<\/p>\n<p>Peter Jackson is teaming up with Stephen Colbert to create a NEW Lord of the Rings movie!<\/p>\n<p>This will be centered around the 6 chapters early in the Fellowship of the Ring that weren\u2019t developed in Peter Jacksons movies from \u201cThree Is Company\u201d to \u201cFog on the\u2026 <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/urifnuL2V3\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">pic.twitter.com\/urifnuL2V3<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 The Mellon Heads \u2013 LOTR Podcast (@mellon_heads) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/mellon_heads\/status\/2036734910287794337?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">March 25, 2026<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Source: @mellon_heads\/X.com<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">We\u2019re supposed to trust this whole project because Colbert is allegedly a \u201csuperfan\u201d of the books. He\u2019s really keen on all the little details of the \u201ccanon.\u201d One of the problems here \u2014 aside from the fact that Colbert can\u2019t even write one-liners on Late night, much less a screenplay \u2014 is that Colbert claims to be a Catholic, but he doesn\u2019t take any of those \u201ccanonical\u201d teachings seriously at all. He\u2019s pro-abortion and pro-gender insanity, and he openly mocks Catholics all of the time. So you probably shouldn\u2019t hold your breath if you think Stephen Colbert, of all people, is going to take any text seriously \u2014 even if he claims to be a \u201cfan.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">But even if you trust Stephen Colbert for some reason, and even if you don\u2019t know anything about \u201cLord of the Rings\u201d at all, think about what he just said for a second. He\u2019s saying that there are six chapters in \u201cThe Fellowship of the Ring,\u201d which, \u201ccould be its own story which could fit into the larger story.\u201d But that\u2019s exactly what these chapters already are. They\u2019re six chapters in the larger story. They aren\u2019t a story all by themselves. And those six chapters are so unimportant, relative to the rest of the book, that they were mostly \u2014 but not entirely \u2014 dropped from the Peter Jackson films. There was no Tom Bombadil in the films, for example.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">But now we\u2019re supposed to believe that these six chapters \u2014 and Tom Bombadil \u2014 are actually a self-contained story that justify an entirely new film. So how will that work, exactly? What\u2019s the \u201cframing device\u201d that Stephen Colbert is talking about? If you pull up the logline for this doomed project, here\u2019s what you\u2019ll find. \u201cFourteen years after the passing of Frodo \u2014 Sam, Merry and Pippin set out to retrace the first steps of their adventure. Meanwhile, Sam\u2019s daughter, Elanor, has discovered a long-buried secret and is determined to uncover why the War of the Ring was very nearly lost before it even began.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">Translating that, we can assume that, just like the anime, and just like the Amazon \u201cRings of Power\u201d series that no one likes, this is going to be yet another piece of feminist propaganda, designed to destroy one of the most unapologetically male-dominated stories in Western literature. They\u2019re going to have Sam\u2019s daughter go off and save the world or whatever, telling a story through flashbacks. These people know that \u201cLord of the Rings\u201d had almost no female characters at all. And Modern Hollywood sees that fact as a sin that must be rectified. They\u2019re intent on feminizing the franchise and injecting female characters into it. They\u2019ve decided that Tolkien\u2019s almost exclusively male story must be retold through a feminist lens. Effectively, it\u2019s feminist reparations. And if it bombs, they don\u2019t care. Win or lose, as long as they put something in theaters, they get to hold onto the rights for a little while longer.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">At this point, you might think \u2014 well, so what. Hollywood\u2019s been terrible for a while, and no one cares about mainstream movies anymore, especially young people. First of all, to the extent that\u2019s true, it\u2019s still a major victory for the Left. They exist to demoralize as many Americans as possible. But more importantly, this is not simply a Hollywood project. What\u2019s happening to the \u201cLord of the Rings\u201d is emblematic of a much broader trend, which amounts to the deliberate, coordinated mass-feminization of American culture. Everything has to be feminine now. Men can\u2019t have their own \u201cspaces,\u201d to use the lingo. Men are denigrated and discriminated against as a matter of policy. At the same time, women \u2014 as well as emasculated men who claim to be women \u2014 are elevated and promoted at every opportunity.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">There\u2019s no better illustration of this phenomenon than what\u2019s happened to the Boy Scouts. They\u2019re gone now. As of 2025, the Boy Scouts have rebranded as \u201cScouting America,\u201d after several years of accepting girls and homosexuals. Yes, they were accepting girls into the \u201cBoy Scouts,\u201d supposedly as a way to boost membership. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">Meanwhile, the Girl Scouts still exist \u2014 and according to their website as of today, they don\u2019t allow boys to join. So girls have a gender-specific \u201cscouting\u201d organization to join, and boys don\u2019t. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">Watch:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><div class=\"youtube-embed\" data-video_id=\"DU_ntakYMc0\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Boy Scouts change name for first time in 114 years\" width=\"696\" height=\"392\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/DU_ntakYMc0?feature=oembed&#038;enablejsapi=1\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/div>\n<\/p>\n<p>Source: 9News\/YouTube.com<\/p>\n<p><div class=\"youtube-embed\" data-video_id=\"VNO8oJES--0\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Why the Boy Scouts is changing its name\" width=\"696\" height=\"392\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/VNO8oJES--0?feature=oembed&#038;enablejsapi=1\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/div>\n<\/p>\n<p>Source: Associated Press\/YouTube.com<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">He says the reason they accepted girls into the Boy Scouts is that membership was too low. Which is really a remarkable statement. It\u2019s like a goat farmer who says, \u201chuh, I don\u2019t have enough goats on the property. Time to bring in some wolves, so that I get my numbers up.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">Actually, if membership is low, the solution isn\u2019t to destroy the organization. Nor is the solution to promote \u201cgay Scouts\u201d and hold \u201cLGBTQ\u201d struggle sessions or whatever. The solution is to build an organization in which parents \u2014 not random pedophiles \u2014 organize outdoor activities that are actually interesting to young men.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">It\u2019s quite possible that Democrats would sue over that \u2014 since every good idea is a civil rights violation \u2014 but it would\u2019ve been worth a try. Instead, they\u2019ve simply eliminated the Boy Scouts entirely, while the Girl Scouts continue to exist without any problems.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">One of the reasons this is happening is that, even with the rise of gender insanity, most people (outside of states like Washington and California) can agree that it\u2019s important for girls to have their own private \u201cspaces.\u201d When males invade a female space, it clearly makes girls less safe and robs them of opportunity. That\u2019s just a matter of basic biological reality \u2014 a male in a female\u2019s locker room poses a much greater threat than a female in a male\u2019s locker room. You don\u2019t need to affirm any unpopular ideas or commit transgressions against feminism to make the point.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">But the argument for keeping women out of male spaces is more dangerous. The point isn\u2019t that men are made less safe or that the women will out-compete them. The point is first that men are more suited for these roles and generally better at them. If you did an honest survey of the 10,000 people in the world most suited to be astronauts or military generals, all 10,000 will be men. And we all know that. Second, when you wedge women into an institution, you destroy the male fraternal camaraderie. Women are inevitably scandalized by how men relate to one another. And so their inclusion means that everyone now has to start acting like chicks.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">We saw this play out with the various female defectors from the MAGA movement, like Ashley St. Claire. These women showed up to a heavily male space, immediately got their feelings hurt because men are acting and speaking like men, and then went crying about it and demanding that changes are made to better accommodate them. So that\u2019s why people are less eager to make the case for male-only spaces. It requires you to be more honest than most people are prepared to be.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">In fact, even in the Girls\u2019 Scouts, they\u2019re not being entirely honest about their position. They have an obvious problem to confront: the Left now defines a \u201cgirl\u201d as \u201canyone who claims to be a girl.\u201d So how exactly do the Girl Scouts prevent a male pervert from saying he\u2019s a girl from taking advantage of the situation? As it turns out, that dilemma came up a few years ago.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">Here\u2019s how they handled it:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><div class=\"youtube-embed\" data-video_id=\"28D3d3NGkfY\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Girl Scouts distances itself from online form that allows boys in overnight camp\" width=\"696\" height=\"392\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/28D3d3NGkfY?feature=oembed&#038;enablejsapi=1\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/div>\n<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">Notice what\u2019s happening here. The Girl Scouts know that they can\u2019t have boys inside the girl\u2019s spaces. But they also know that, if they say that out loud, they\u2019ll get bankrupted by lawsuits from trans activists. So instead, they make you \u201cread between the lines.\u201d They leave the decision up to individual chapters and parents \u2014 which is to say, they don\u2019t make a decision at all. They\u2019re hoping that fathers will be enough of a deterrent \u2014 which may or may not be the case.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">The point is, this is how convoluted and backwards our institutions have become. They\u2019re more feminine than ever, even as the words \u201cboy\u201d and \u201cgirl\u201d lose all meaning to the Left. The more powerful the gender industry becomes, the more universally feminine our culture becomes. And unequivocally, that\u2019s a bad thing.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">We\u2019ll start with the data on some of the institutions that have been feminized in this country. Women now substantially outnumber men in both medical schools and law schools. That was never the case prior to 2019 and 2016, respectively. These are two professions with very demanding hours \u2014 the kind that make it very difficult to raise a family. And there\u2019s an obvious premium on logic over emotion. And yet, because of systematic discrimination against men, women are now dominating these fields. The same is true of pharmacy, dentistry, optometry, veterinary medicine, and psychology \u2014 all of which were male-dominated in the 1960s and 70s, and all of which are now overwhelmingly controlled by women. Something like 75% of psychologists are women now \u2014 when in the 1970s, it was closer to 20 to 30%.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">Outside of these fields (which are mostly medical in nature), the trend continues. 62% of the writers on streaming shows are women, <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2025\/09\/09\/business\/media\/women-creators-television-streaming.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight:400\">according <\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight:400\">to a study from San Diego State University. And when it comes to casting, women typically play the characters who are highly moral and competent, while the white men are dysfunctional terrorists. This is just one of about a million examples, from a recent BBC show. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">Watch:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">The BBC aired a show where the villain is a white dude who filed freedom of information requests about illegal migration.<\/p>\n<p>They then show him laying on a beach with a rifle, waiting to shoot them as they arrive by boat.<\/p>\n<p>Just next-level propaganda. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/gGwzQuNWCb\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">pic.twitter.com\/gGwzQuNWCb<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Bonchie (@bonchieredstate) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/bonchieredstate\/status\/2036957977379262522?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">March 26, 2026<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Source: @bonchieredstate<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">\u201cNine freedom of information requests??\u201d My Goodness. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">And then there\u2019s the part where he gets banned on 4Chan for posting a selfie video, which makes no sense for at least three reasons: One, no one posts selfie videos on 4Chan. Two, no one has an \u201caccount\u201d on 4Chan that can get \u201cbanned.\u201d And three, even if 4Chan did ban \u201caccounts\u201d for posting selfie videos, they definitely wouldn\u2019t ban someone for criticizing foreign migration to Europe. That\u2019s about as tame as it gets. But for the women who write this show, and produce it, and star in it, none of these issues matter. What\u2019s important is that the white guy is a terrorist because he wants access to government data on the number of murders that foreign invaders are committing.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">But let\u2019s continue, because streaming is just one example of this phenomenon. <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bls.gov\/cps\/cpsaat11.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight:400\">According<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight:400\"> to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 66% of PR specialists are women. So we\u2019ve come a very long way from the \u201cMad Men\u201d era, to put it mildly. Union management gigs transformed into so-called \u201cHuman Resources Departments,\u201d which as we all know, are controlled entirely by women. Even a profession like \u201caccounting and auditing\u201d \u2014 which you\u2019d expect to be male-dominated because it involves numbers \u2014 is now 59% female, <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bls.gov\/cps\/cpsaat11.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight:400\">according <\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight:400\">to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">Actually, if you have the time, I\u2019d encourage you to pull up the Labor statistics website yourself, to see how stark this transformation is. You\u2019d have an easier time finding jobs where women are the minority, at this point. Women are the majority of management professionals, business and financial operations specialists, judges, librarians, paralegals, medical scientists, \u201cArts, design, entertainment, sports, and media occupations,\u201d healthcare practitioners, insurance sales, school bus drivers, mental health counselors, claims adjusters, \u201cquality assurance specialists\u201d in computer software, advertising and promotions managers, budget analysts, insurance underwriters, social workers, post-secondary teachers (and every other kind of teacher), interior designers, event planners, credit counselors and loan officers, business managers, and so on. Half a century ago, most of these fields looked very, very different.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">And in response you might say \u2014 well, that\u2019s what progress looks like! Now that women are in charge, everything\u2019s better. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">But that would be a lie, because everything isn\u2019t better. Quite the contrary. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">I would challenge you to name one institution, anywhere in existence, that has gotten better \u2014 more effective, efficient, productive \u2014 as it has gotten more feminized. Out of all those professions I just listed, have any of them improved in the past few decades, to your knowledge? <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">Do you think advertising is better now, for example? Do you think Don Draper could learn some lessons from the women who permanently demolished the image of Cracker Barrel and Bud Light? <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">What about the insurance industry, or therapy? Have there been any breakthroughs there \u2014 aside from the coordinated effort to diagnose every child with some form of mental illness, so they can be given drugs for the rest of their lives? <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">And how about judges \u2014 do you think they\u2019re doing a better job now? Unless you\u2019re a fan of criminals who repeatedly get out of jail \u2014 including criminals who literally <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.dailywire.com\/news\/an-update-on-the-shocking-crime-that-democrats-dont-want-you-to-know-about\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight:400\">murder<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight:400\"> children while they sleep (which we saw in the Ronald Exantus case, for example) \u2014 then you\u2019d be hard-pressed to praise the changes in the judicial branch in this country.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">So what\u2019s gotten better, exactly? Space travel certainly hasn\u2019t. Astronauts were 100% male in 1969 when they were landing on the moon. Today, every graduating class at NASA is roughly 50% female, and NASA basically hasn\u2019t done anything in 20 years. Seriously, if you can think of anything I\u2019m missing, let me know. I\u2019m not being sarcastic. But the more we see women getting placed in positions where they obviously don\u2019t belong, the more important the question becomes.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">Consider what\u2019s just happened over at the so-called Church of England. This is a Protestant church that, long ago, decided to promote \u201cLGBT clergy,\u201d female clergy, gay marriage and so on. For nearly two years, the role of archbishop of Canterbury \u2014 the highest-ranking cleric of the Church of England \u2014 has remained vacant. And no one has really cared. The Protestants in England managed to make themselves totally irrelevant by disregarding scripture and embracing every trendy tenet of Leftism, to the point that they just left the role of archbishop vacant, and it wasn\u2019t a big deal. The tens of millions of baptized members of the church weren\u2019t bothered by it.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">But the other day, at long last, a new archbishop was named. And for the first time ever, appropriately enough, the archbishop is a woman. The Church of England is now officially led, on a day-to-day basis, by a pro-abortion, pro-open borders Leftist with absolutely zero regard for Scripture.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">Watch:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">\ud83c\uddec\ud83c\udde7 Dame Sarah Mullally is officially \u201centhroned\u201d as the Archbishop of Canterbury, becoming the first woman to take the role.<\/p>\n<p>Follow: <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/europa?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">@europa<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/VRXOHp2d4C\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">pic.twitter.com\/VRXOHp2d4C<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Europa.com (@europa) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/europa\/status\/2036839411397071284?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">March 25, 2026<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Source: @europa\/X.com<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">Well, at least she\u2019s happy. It\u2019s one of the great tricks of the modern Left that they demand \u2014 and receive \u2014 thunderous applause as they degrade everything they touch. These are people who insist on \u201cinclusivity\u201d that goes in only one direction \u2014 inclusivity that disenfranchises men and elevates incompetence on the basis of gender.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">It\u2019s no great mystery how this happens. Put simply, there\u2019s no one standing in their way \u2014 no resistance at all. Conservatives in the United States will rush to protect female-only spaces, which is appropriate and necessary in most cases. They\u2019ll condemn the \u201cWi Spa incident,\u201d where a man tries to force his way into a women\u2019s locker room. But at the same time, for all of their bravery in protecting women\u2019s spaces, very few conservatives have done anything to protect male-only spaces. They haven\u2019t announced plans or funding for a new Boy Scout program. They haven\u2019t brought massive lawsuits against schools and employers that discriminate against men, in the same way that they\u2019ve sued schools and employers that discriminate against whites and Asians.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">It\u2019s maybe the single most overlooked and neglected issue in all of American culture and politics, and it\u2019s hard to believe it\u2019s an accident. Men, including young men, need more opportunities to participate in their shared interests, beyond social media and video games and politics. This country used to offer plenty of those opportunities. And although you aren\u2019t supposed to say it, we were a much more cohesive, efficient and competent country as a result.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><script async src=\"\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><br \/>\n<br \/><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.dailywire.com\/news\/everything-in-society-has-been-feminized-and-its-been-a-total-disaster-heres-proof\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here\u2019s something you probably don\u2019t realize about how Hollywood works. I know I wasn\u2019t familiar with it. But it turns out that, for some of the biggest franchises in the industry, studios often sign \u201cuse-it-or-lose-it agreements.\u201d What this means is that they buy the rights to a franchise for a certain number of years. But [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":22311,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-22310","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-current-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22310","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22310"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22310\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/22311"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22310"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22310"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22310"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}