{"id":23675,"date":"2026-04-25T12:00:41","date_gmt":"2026-04-25T12:00:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/2026\/04\/25\/no-crushes-wont-help-your-marriage\/"},"modified":"2026-04-25T12:00:41","modified_gmt":"2026-04-25T12:00:41","slug":"no-crushes-wont-help-your-marriage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/2026\/04\/25\/no-crushes-wont-help-your-marriage\/","title":{"rendered":"No, Crushes Won\u2019t Help Your Marriage"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div style=\"position:relative\" data-narration-container=\"true\">\n<p><i>This article is part of\u00a0<\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/www.dailywire.com\/news\/introducing-upstream-a-lifestyle-and-culture-section-of-the-daily-wire\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><i>Upstream,<\/i><\/a><i>\u00a0The Daily Wire\u2019s new home for culture and lifestyle. Real human insight and human stories \u2014 from our featured writers to you.<\/i><\/p>\n<p><i>***<\/i><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">The Cut has a knack for repackaging relational instability as self-discovery. The women-focused online arm of New York Magazine that brought us pieces like <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight:400\">\u201c<\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thecut.com\/article\/non-monogamy-equal-parenting.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><i><span style=\"font-weight:400\">Could Opening Your Marriage Lighten Your Mental Load?<\/span><\/i><\/a><i><span style=\"font-weight:400\">\u201d<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight:400\"> and <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight:400\">\u201c<\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thecut.com\/article\/women-regret-having-children.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><i><span style=\"font-weight:400\">I Regret Having Children<\/span><\/i><\/a><i><span style=\"font-weight:400\">\u201d<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight:400\"> is at it again \u2014 this time with E.J. Dickson\u2019s essay <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight:400\">\u201c<\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thecut.com\/article\/its-good-to-have-crushes-when-youre-married.html?utm_source=insta&amp;utm_medium=s1&amp;utm_campaign=nym\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><i><span style=\"font-weight:400\">The Secret to a Great Marriage? Crushes on Other People<\/span><\/i><\/a><i><span style=\"font-weight:400\">.\u201d<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">In it, Dickson begins by describing a co-worker named Phil, whom she compares to a swarthier Jake Gyllenhaal, and who, she notes, didn\u2019t know what a \u201cnut graf\u201d was. She emphasizes that she did not know him well: by the time they stopped working together, they had exchanged only about 40 words, most of them about Steely Dan.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">She mentions him occasionally to her husband of nearly 10 years, who would joke about her \u201cfrissons of nervous energy\u201d when asked if Phil had been at work that day. When she knew he would be in the office, she found herself lingering a little longer in front of the mirror \u2014 adding lip tint and mascara, taking extra care with her hair before meetings.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">Actually, much of the piece focuses on workplace dynamics and so-called \u201cwork husbands and wives.\u201d One interviewee, Jill, 32, recalls that her now-husband once confessed to having a minor crush on a co-worker. At the time, she was feeling sexually bored in their relationship, and she describes the admission as unexpectedly \u201cdeeply erotic.\u201d The couple later folded the subject into their pre-sex conversations. Jill said it \u201crecalibrated\u201d how she perceived him.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">\u201cA crush while you\u2019re married is like a little sweet snack that gets you through the 4 p.m. slump,\u201d said Cara, 35. \u201cIt\u2019s harmless and invigorating,\u201d she said, \u201cand reminds you you\u2019re alive and kicking and yearning and thinking.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">While some pushed back on the piece in the comments, most others were predictable: \u201cBrace for puritan moralism,\u201d one said. \u201cSad to see so many people missing the point,\u201d wrote another, \u201cit\u2019s not about infidelity.\u201d And finally: \u201cIt\u2019s not that deep man \u2026 having crushes is human. Enjoy.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">I was surprised to feel my body tense as I read the article through for the first time. I had lived out this theory as a college student, and the lessons were still living in my muscles \u2014 little \u201cfrissons of nervous energy\u201d that I recognized now for what they were: alarm bells.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">During a long-term relationship, I found myself co-creating a new music festival with an older mentor and friend. At first, it was innocent: writing grants after class, trading notes in a shared Google Doc. I admired his drive, his obvious talent. But admiration has a way of slipping its bounds. Soon, I felt that familiar, muscle-melting pull at the mere mention of his name.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">As the months passed, we were pulling all-nighters, contacting venues, creating floor plans, evaluating artist applications, united in a common purpose and building a shared world from scratch. I found my mind wandering: what other worlds might we be capable of sharing? Electric fingers grazed my leg under the table. I was sick with confusion, regret, desire. I was in trouble.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">If this wasn\u2019t \u201cthat deep, man,\u201d how did I get here? From ruminating on a nagging desire to indulging it? From a passing thought to a habit of mind; from a shared project to a divided interior life; from keeping a little secret to hiding whole chambers of my heart?\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">What I thought was rare, even clandestine, was anything but. Some estimates suggest that as many as 85% of affairs begin at work. \u201cNow we have a shared purpose,\u201d psychologist John Delony <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/reels\/DHEDYfFgQC_\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight:400\">explains<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight:400\">. \u201cWe\u2019re talking about how we feel about things. We have a goal, we have metrics. I\u2019m spending more time with her or him than I am with my spouse. Of course it happens at work.\u201d\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">Conservative politicians have gone to great lengths to avoid precisely this kind of entanglement, most famously Mike Pence, who has said he avoids dining, traveling, or spending one-on-one time with women who are not his wife. Even among my closest friends, this rule tends to draw skepticism, dismissed as a relic of the aforementioned \u201cPuritan moralism\u201d or an overcorrection bordering on paranoia.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">But is it overkill? The Christian ethic has never limited fidelity to outward behavior alone; it presses much deeper, into the interior life. Scripture consistently treats the heart as the true seat of fidelity, as Proverbs says: \u201cAbove all else, guard your heart, for everything you do flows from it\u201d (Proverbs 4:23). Jesus sharpens the point, saying, \u201canyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart\u201d (Matthew 5:28).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">Desire untethered from discipline, he points out, is not neutral; it is formative. Thoughts become patterns, patterns become habits, and habits, eventually, become actions. Crushes aren\u2019t \u201charmless\u201d; they\u2019re the beginning of disordered desire that reshapes the heart and threatens our fidelity.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">\u201cTake every thought captive,\u201d Paul writes (2 Corinthians 10:5) because what you dwell on begins to shape what you want, and what you want begins to shape what you do. To indulge a wandering emotional or imaginative life is, in a real sense, to erode the foundation of a covenant that is meant to be steadfast regardless of passing urges. In other words, master your desires, or they will master you.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">This ethic serves another purpose: It keeps us from subtly turning one another into objects. The logic of the \u201ccrush,\u201d as the article itself admits, depends on a kind of selective vision: \u201cYou\u2019re getting to focus on the desirable parts of that person while ignoring the parts that wouldn\u2019t actually be fun to deal with in reality. That\u2019s super-sexy \u2026 Relish in the fantasy.\u201d\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">That same logic appears more explicitly in other work by E. J. Dickson. In her 2016 article for the Washington Post titled \u201c<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/posteverything\/wp\/2016\/10\/12\/dont-worry-about-sex-robots-they-wont-ruin-sex\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight:400\">Don\u2019t worry about sex robots. They won\u2019t ruin sex<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight:400\">,\u201d she entertains the possibility that even deeply disordered desires might be safely redirected onto objects, writing that technologies like child sex robots could \u201cserve as such an outlet.\u201d\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">The mistaken assumption is that desire can be indulged, even trained, so long as it is displaced onto something non-human; that objectification is not only harmless, but potentially therapeutic. But to \u201crelish in the fantasy\u201d is, almost by definition, to flatten a person, to strip them of their full humanity and complexity and recast them as a vehicle for your own emotional or erotic gratification.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400\">In our marriage, my husband and I have resisted this ethic in ways that might seem excessive to secular friends: There are songs I no longer play because of the memories they evoke, restaurants we no longer visit because of vignettes they hold. We\u2019ve chosen, deliberately, to build a shared world. And with each quiet act of discipline, each decision to honor him in thought and action, my desire is shaped and redirected, returning to the person it was always meant for. Every time, my crush on him grows deeper.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>***<\/p>\n<p><em>Grace Salvatore is the senior editor of media, arts, and culture at Ayaan Hirsi Ali\u2019s Restoring the West and a contributor to Independent Women\u2019s Voice.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><script async src=\"\/\/www.instagram.com\/embed.js\"><\/script><br \/>\n<br \/><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.dailywire.com\/news\/no-crushes-wont-help-your-marriage\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This article is part of\u00a0Upstream,\u00a0The Daily Wire\u2019s new home for culture and lifestyle. Real human insight and human stories \u2014 from our featured writers to you. *** The Cut has a knack for repackaging relational instability as self-discovery. The women-focused online arm of New York Magazine that brought us pieces like \u201cCould Opening Your Marriage [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":23676,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"tdm_status":"","tdm_grid_status":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-23675","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-current-news"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23675","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23675"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23675\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/23676"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23675"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23675"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23675"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}