{"id":6706,"date":"2025-05-14T20:29:39","date_gmt":"2025-05-14T20:29:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/2025\/05\/14\/giacometti-flops-at-sothebys-artists-set-records-at-phillips\/"},"modified":"2025-05-14T20:29:48","modified_gmt":"2025-05-14T20:29:48","slug":"giacometti-flops-at-sothebys-artists-set-records-at-phillips","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/2025\/05\/14\/giacometti-flops-at-sothebys-artists-set-records-at-phillips\/","title":{"rendered":"Giacometti Flops at Sotheby\u2019s; Artists Set Records at Phillips"},"content":{"rendered":"<div itemprop=\"articleBody\">\n<figure id=\"attachment_1554793\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1554793\" style=\"width: 970px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-1554793\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Sotheby\u2019s Modern Evening Auction saw a headline lot by Giacometti falter dramatically, casting a shadow over an otherwise solid $186.4 million result. <span class=\"media-credit\">Brendon Cook\/BFA.com<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>If the prevailing art market mantra in recent months has been that, while buyers may be more selective, true quality will always sell, then what unfolded last night at Sotheby\u2019s <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sothebys.com\/en\/buy\/auction\/2025\/modern-evening-auction\">Modern Evening Auction<\/a> delivered a sobering counterpoint. The evening\u2019s centerpiece\u2014<a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/list\/top-10-artworks-may-2025-auctions-christies-sothebys-phillips\/\">Giacometti\u2019s bronze bust of his brother Diego<\/a>, the only known hand-painted version and a highlight of the 1956 Venice Biennale\u2014was a dramatic pass. Despite being billed as the star lot, <i>Grande t\u00eate mince (Grande t\u00eate de Diego)<\/i>, consigned by the Soloviev Foundation to benefit its charities, stalled after a few rounds of chandelier bidding and fell short of its $70 million estimate, dissolving into the uneasy silence of a muted salesroom. The work went to the rostrum without a guarantee or an irrevocable bid\u2014a bold, some might say reckless, move in a market where such mechanisms are increasingly treated less like optional safeguards and more like essential life preservers. The lingering question is whether the consignors were too eager to test the waters unprotected. The estimate itself may have been ambitious enough to dissuade even the most ardent trophy hunters, though this time, the trophy was undeniably the real thing. \u201cIt simply wasn\u2019t its moment,\u201d said <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/person\/julian-dawes\/\" title=\"Julian Dawes\" class=\"company-link\">Julian Dawes<\/a>, Sotheby\u2019s head of Impressionist and modern art in the Americas. \u201cOur belief in the work remains undiminished.\u201d Sotheby\u2019s CEO <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/person\/charles-stewart\/\" title=\"Charles Stewart\" class=\"company-link\">Charles Stewart<\/a> echoed the sentiment, calling the result \u201can organic, genuine auction moment,\u201d and stressing, \u201cIt wasn\u2019t financially engineered at all. It was the seller believing in the work and willing to sell at a price.\u201d<\/p>\n<section class=\"wp-block-observer-newsletters observer-newsletters--in-content\">\n<\/section>\n<p>In recent years, Giacometti has cemented his position as a reliable cornerstone of the auction market\u2014a blue-chip name that consistently performs and seldom disappoints, even during periods of economic turbulence. But as auction houses increasingly err on the side of caution, it\u2019s possible the market has been oversaturated this season. Last night at Sotheby\u2019s, the house also offered <i>Femme debout (Poseuse I)<\/i> from the collection of Hollywood film producer Joseph H. Hazen\u2014one of the evening\u2019s standout consignments. Opening at $3.4 million, the sculpture ignited a prolonged bidding battle, ultimately hammering down after more than five tense minutes for $5.6 million ($6.8 million with premium), landing comfortably above its $4-6 million estimate.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p data-start=\"152\" data-end=\"896\"><strong><em>SEE ALSO: <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/2025\/05\/art-may-auctions-christies-riggio-collection-20th-century-evening-sale-2025\/\">Despite Q<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/2025\/05\/art-may-auctions-christies-riggio-collection-20th-century-evening-sale-2025\/\">uiet Bidding, Christie\u2019s Evening Sales Brought in $489M<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p class=\"\" data-start=\"160\" data-end=\"642\">Despite the Giacometti miss, which admittedly cast a long shadow over the evening, Sotheby\u2019s still brought in a respectable $186.4 million across sixty lots\u2014albeit short of its presale estimate of $240.3 million to $318.7 million. The sale felt noticeably livelier than Christie\u2019s the night before, with deeper competition across several lots despite a few sharp disappointments. Of the works that did sell, roughly 40 percent exceeded their high estimates, and twenty-six lots were guaranteed\u2014twenty-four of them backed by third parties.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_1549833\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1549833\" style=\"width: 970px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"lazyload wp-image-1549833 size-full-width\" src=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/04\/Alberto-Giacometti-Grande-tete-mince-Grande-tete-de-Diego.jpg?quality=80&amp;w=970\" alt=\"A textured bronze sculpture by Alberto Giacometti depicting a tall, narrow head in profile with exaggerated features and a rough, expressive surface.\" width=\"970\" height=\"1294\" srcset=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/04\/Alberto-Giacometti-Grande-tete-mince-Grande-tete-de-Diego.jpg 6208w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/04\/Alberto-Giacometti-Grande-tete-mince-Grande-tete-de-Diego.jpg?resize=225,300 225w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/04\/Alberto-Giacometti-Grande-tete-mince-Grande-tete-de-Diego.jpg?resize=768,1024 768w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/04\/Alberto-Giacometti-Grande-tete-mince-Grande-tete-de-Diego.jpg?resize=450,600 450w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/04\/Alberto-Giacometti-Grande-tete-mince-Grande-tete-de-Diego.jpg?resize=1152,1536 1152w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/04\/Alberto-Giacometti-Grande-tete-mince-Grande-tete-de-Diego.jpg?resize=1536,2048 1536w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/04\/Alberto-Giacometti-Grande-tete-mince-Grande-tete-de-Diego.jpg?resize=970,1294 970w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/04\/Alberto-Giacometti-Grande-tete-mince-Grande-tete-de-Diego.jpg?resize=320,427 320w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/04\/Alberto-Giacometti-Grande-tete-mince-Grande-tete-de-Diego.jpg?resize=1920,2561 1920w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/04\/Alberto-Giacometti-Grande-tete-mince-Grande-tete-de-Diego.jpg?resize=37,50 37w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 300px, 620px\"\/><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"lazyload wp-image-1549833 size-full-width\" src=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/04\/Alberto-Giacometti-Grande-tete-mince-Grande-tete-de-Diego.jpg?quality=80&amp;w=970\" alt=\"A textured bronze sculpture by Alberto Giacometti depicting a tall, narrow head in profile with exaggerated features and a rough, expressive surface.\" width=\"970\" height=\"1294\" srcset=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/04\/Alberto-Giacometti-Grande-tete-mince-Grande-tete-de-Diego.jpg 6208w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/04\/Alberto-Giacometti-Grande-tete-mince-Grande-tete-de-Diego.jpg?resize=225,300 225w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/04\/Alberto-Giacometti-Grande-tete-mince-Grande-tete-de-Diego.jpg?resize=768,1024 768w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/04\/Alberto-Giacometti-Grande-tete-mince-Grande-tete-de-Diego.jpg?resize=450,600 450w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/04\/Alberto-Giacometti-Grande-tete-mince-Grande-tete-de-Diego.jpg?resize=1152,1536 1152w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/04\/Alberto-Giacometti-Grande-tete-mince-Grande-tete-de-Diego.jpg?resize=1536,2048 1536w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/04\/Alberto-Giacometti-Grande-tete-mince-Grande-tete-de-Diego.jpg?resize=970,1294 970w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/04\/Alberto-Giacometti-Grande-tete-mince-Grande-tete-de-Diego.jpg?resize=320,427 320w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/04\/Alberto-Giacometti-Grande-tete-mince-Grande-tete-de-Diego.jpg?resize=1920,2561 1920w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/04\/Alberto-Giacometti-Grande-tete-mince-Grande-tete-de-Diego.jpg?resize=37,50 37w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 300px, 620px\"\/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-1549833\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Alberto Giacometti\u2019s <em>Grande t\u00eate mince<\/em> (1955) failed to meet its $70 million estimate. <span class=\"media-credit\">Courtesy of Sotheby&#8217;s<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Ten lots failed to sell, leaving Sotheby\u2019s with a final sell-through rate of 83 percent. Notably, 40 percent of the offerings were fresh to the market\u2014and those works generally outperformed the rest. That was true for one of the evening\u2019s top lots, <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/person\/alexander-calder\/\" title=\"Alexander Calder\" class=\"company-link\">Alexander Calder<\/a>\u2019s <i>Four Big Dots<\/i>, held in the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art\u2019s collection for more than 60 years and offered to support future acquisitions and collection care. It sold to a bidder in the room for $8,285,000. Similarly, Georgia O\u2019Keeffe\u2019s <i>Leaves of a Plant<\/i> (1942), making its auction debut, surpassed expectations by fetching $12,972,500 against an $8-12 million estimate. Acquired by the seller in 1978, the work had debuted in O\u2019Keeffe\u2019s 1943 retrospective at An American Place and was later exhibited widely, including in the Georgia O\u2019Keeffe Museum\u2019s inaugural show in 1997. Among the other top performers was Picasso\u2019s <i>Homme assis<\/i> (1969), which brought in $15 million\u2014one of the strongest results for the series.<\/p>\n<p>Still, to achieve that sell-through rate, Sotheby\u2019s quietly withdrew at least four lots before the sale, including <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/person\/wassily-kandinsky\/\" title=\"Wassily Kandinsky\" class=\"company-link\">Wassily Kandinsky<\/a>\u2019s <i>Study for Improvisation 10<\/i> (1910), estimated at $6\u20138 million. During the auction, auctioneer Oliver Barker noted that <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/person\/rufino-tamayo\/\" title=\"Rufino Tamayo\" class=\"company-link\">Rufino Tamayo<\/a>\u2019s <i>Brindis<\/i> (1949) likely failed to find a buyer, despite growing interest in the artist, as its $1-1.5 million estimate appeared overly ambitious.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_1554795\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1554795\" style=\"width: 970px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"lazyload wp-image-1554795 size-full-width\" src=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-4-Frantisek-Kupka-Flux-et-reflux.jpg?quality=80&amp;w=970\" alt=\"A vibrant abstract painting dominated by a large, stylized purple flower with black outlines and blue and green highlights, surrounded by swirling forms.\" width=\"970\" height=\"792\" srcset=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-4-Frantisek-Kupka-Flux-et-reflux.jpg 4156w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-4-Frantisek-Kupka-Flux-et-reflux.jpg?resize=300,245 300w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-4-Frantisek-Kupka-Flux-et-reflux.jpg?resize=768,627 768w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-4-Frantisek-Kupka-Flux-et-reflux.jpg?resize=635,518 635w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-4-Frantisek-Kupka-Flux-et-reflux.jpg?resize=1536,1254 1536w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-4-Frantisek-Kupka-Flux-et-reflux.jpg?resize=2048,1672 2048w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-4-Frantisek-Kupka-Flux-et-reflux.jpg?resize=970,792 970w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-4-Frantisek-Kupka-Flux-et-reflux.jpg?resize=320,261 320w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-4-Frantisek-Kupka-Flux-et-reflux.jpg?resize=1920,1567 1920w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-4-Frantisek-Kupka-Flux-et-reflux.jpg?resize=50,41 50w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 300px, 620px\"\/><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"lazyload wp-image-1554795 size-full-width\" src=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-4-Frantisek-Kupka-Flux-et-reflux.jpg?quality=80&amp;w=970\" alt=\"A vibrant abstract painting dominated by a large, stylized purple flower with black outlines and blue and green highlights, surrounded by swirling forms.\" width=\"970\" height=\"792\" srcset=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-4-Frantisek-Kupka-Flux-et-reflux.jpg 4156w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-4-Frantisek-Kupka-Flux-et-reflux.jpg?resize=300,245 300w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-4-Frantisek-Kupka-Flux-et-reflux.jpg?resize=768,627 768w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-4-Frantisek-Kupka-Flux-et-reflux.jpg?resize=635,518 635w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-4-Frantisek-Kupka-Flux-et-reflux.jpg?resize=1536,1254 1536w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-4-Frantisek-Kupka-Flux-et-reflux.jpg?resize=2048,1672 2048w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-4-Frantisek-Kupka-Flux-et-reflux.jpg?resize=970,792 970w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-4-Frantisek-Kupka-Flux-et-reflux.jpg?resize=320,261 320w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-4-Frantisek-Kupka-Flux-et-reflux.jpg?resize=1920,1567 1920w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-4-Frantisek-Kupka-Flux-et-reflux.jpg?resize=50,41 50w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 300px, 620px\"\/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-1554795\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Frantis\u030cek Kupka\u2019s <em>Flux et reflux<\/em> (1923) sold for $5,906,000. <span class=\"media-credit\">Sotheby&#8217;s<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Sparking moments of bidder excitement were several standout lots from the Joseph H. Hazen Collection, beginning with <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/person\/robert-delaunay\/\" title=\"Robert Delaunay\" class=\"company-link\">Robert Delaunay<\/a>\u2019s <i>Nature morte<\/i> (1936), which exceeded expectations, hammering at $1.6 million ($2 million with fees) after a lively exchange between bidders in the room and on the phones. Four bidders also chased the next lot, a luminous Franti\u0161ek Kupka, <i>Flux et reflux<\/i> (1923), which surged to $4.8 million ($5.9 million with fees)\u2014helped, no doubt, by the <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/2024\/12\/2review-harmony-and-dissonance-orphism-in-paris-guggenheim\/\">Guggenheim\u2019s recent survey on Orphism<\/a> that reignited interest in the artist\u2019s work. Backed by both a guarantee and an irrevocable bid, the painting\u2014also included in the catalogue for Kupka\u2019s 1975 Guggenheim retrospective\u2014came with the kind of institutional pedigree that may have given it an edge over the following lot, Kupka\u2019s <i>Formes flasques<\/i> (1919-25), which sold below estimate at $4.3 million ($5.2 million with fees).<\/p>\n<p>Tension resurfaced when Fernand L\u00e9ger\u2019s <i>La Jeune fille au bouquet<\/i> (1921), also from the Hazen Collection, failed to meet its $5-7 million estimate, stalling at $4.3 million. A few lots later, Barker reopened bidding and hammered it at $3 million\u2014a clear signal that the seller had adjusted expectations to meet the market where it stood.<\/p>\n<p>As Barker worked to regain momentum following the Giacometti flop, fireworks returned later in the evening. <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/person\/edvard-munch\/\" title=\"Edvard Munch\" class=\"company-link\">Edvard Munch<\/a>\u2019s portrait of Heinrich C. Hudtwalcker drew five phone bidders and hammered at $1.5 million ($1.8 million with fees), selling to a collector in Asia. Immediately after, a heated bidding war broke out over one of the earliest portraits of C\u00e9zanne\u2019s partner and future wife, Hortense Fiquet. <i>Portrait de Madame C\u00e9zanne<\/i> (1877) opened at $3.9 million and hammered at $6 million ($7,370,000 with premium). With only two other portraits of Fiquet having come to auction in the past 25 years, the result marked the second-highest price ever achieved for the subject.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_1554797\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1554797\" style=\"width: 970px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"lazyload wp-image-1554797 size-full-width\" src=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-25-Paul-Cezanne-Portrait-de-Madame-Cezanne-circa-1877.jpg?quality=80&amp;w=970\" alt=\"A painting of a woman with reclined head on a sofa. \" width=\"970\" height=\"816\" srcset=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-25-Paul-Cezanne-Portrait-de-Madame-Cezanne-circa-1877.jpg 7021w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-25-Paul-Cezanne-Portrait-de-Madame-Cezanne-circa-1877.jpg?resize=300,252 300w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-25-Paul-Cezanne-Portrait-de-Madame-Cezanne-circa-1877.jpg?resize=768,646 768w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-25-Paul-Cezanne-Portrait-de-Madame-Cezanne-circa-1877.jpg?resize=635,534 635w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-25-Paul-Cezanne-Portrait-de-Madame-Cezanne-circa-1877.jpg?resize=1536,1293 1536w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-25-Paul-Cezanne-Portrait-de-Madame-Cezanne-circa-1877.jpg?resize=2048,1724 2048w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-25-Paul-Cezanne-Portrait-de-Madame-Cezanne-circa-1877.jpg?resize=970,816 970w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-25-Paul-Cezanne-Portrait-de-Madame-Cezanne-circa-1877.jpg?resize=320,269 320w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-25-Paul-Cezanne-Portrait-de-Madame-Cezanne-circa-1877.jpg?resize=1920,1616 1920w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-25-Paul-Cezanne-Portrait-de-Madame-Cezanne-circa-1877.jpg?resize=50,42 50w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 300px, 620px\"\/><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"lazyload wp-image-1554797 size-full-width\" src=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-25-Paul-Cezanne-Portrait-de-Madame-Cezanne-circa-1877.jpg?quality=80&amp;w=970\" alt=\"A painting of a woman with reclined head on a sofa. \" width=\"970\" height=\"816\" srcset=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-25-Paul-Cezanne-Portrait-de-Madame-Cezanne-circa-1877.jpg 7021w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-25-Paul-Cezanne-Portrait-de-Madame-Cezanne-circa-1877.jpg?resize=300,252 300w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-25-Paul-Cezanne-Portrait-de-Madame-Cezanne-circa-1877.jpg?resize=768,646 768w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-25-Paul-Cezanne-Portrait-de-Madame-Cezanne-circa-1877.jpg?resize=635,534 635w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-25-Paul-Cezanne-Portrait-de-Madame-Cezanne-circa-1877.jpg?resize=1536,1293 1536w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-25-Paul-Cezanne-Portrait-de-Madame-Cezanne-circa-1877.jpg?resize=2048,1724 2048w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-25-Paul-Cezanne-Portrait-de-Madame-Cezanne-circa-1877.jpg?resize=970,816 970w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-25-Paul-Cezanne-Portrait-de-Madame-Cezanne-circa-1877.jpg?resize=320,269 320w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-25-Paul-Cezanne-Portrait-de-Madame-Cezanne-circa-1877.jpg?resize=1920,1616 1920w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-25-Paul-Cezanne-Portrait-de-Madame-Cezanne-circa-1877.jpg?resize=50,42 50w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 300px, 620px\"\/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-1554797\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Lot 25, Paul Ce\u0301zanne\u2019s <em>Portrait de Madame Ce\u0301zanne<\/em> (circa 1877) sold for $7.3 million. <span class=\"media-credit\">Sotheby&#8217;s<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Sotheby\u2019s sale also saw notably heightened participation from Asian clients. Among the highlights was <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/person\/henri-matisse\/\" title=\"Henri Matisse\" class=\"company-link\">Henri Matisse<\/a>\u2019s <i>Le Bouquet d\u2019an\u00e9mones<\/i>, dated 1918 and painted during the pivotal early years of the artist\u2019s celebrated Nice period. Acquired by a Chinese collector, the work had been held in the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art\u2019s collection for over 75 years and was offered to support the museum\u2019s acquisitions fund. It sold swiftly for $1.2 million ($1,514,000 with premium).<\/p>\n<p>Far less enthusiasm greeted a <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/person\/mark-rothko\/\" title=\"Mark Rothko\" class=\"company-link\">Mark Rothko<\/a> from 1968, despite its strong provenance\u2014long part of the collection of <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/person\/carla-panicali\/\" title=\"Carla Panicali\" class=\"company-link\">Carla Panicali<\/a>, the influential Italian gallerist who oversaw Marlborough Gallery\u2019s Rome branch in the 1960s. Opening at $2.8 million, the work hammered at $4.2 million, right within its $3.5\u20135 million estimate ($4,930,000 with premium).<\/p>\n<p>Before the evening wrapped, Barker had the satisfaction of closing on one of the night\u2019s most memorable moments with <i>An Important Double-Pedestal Lamp<\/i> by <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/person\/frank-lloyd-wright\/\" title=\"Frank Lloyd Wright\" class=\"company-link\">Frank Lloyd Wright<\/a>, originally commissioned for the Susan Lawrence Dana House in Springfield, Illinois, over a century ago. Though more esoteric, appealing to a narrower collector base, the lot ignited a prolonged bidding battle and hammered after ten minutes at $6.1 million ($7,492,000 with fees). As the most important Wright work ever brought to auction, it not only doubled its low estimate but shattered the architect\u2019s previous record of $2,903,500\u2014selling for nearly four times the price it achieved when last offered at Sotheby\u2019s in December 2002.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_1554799\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1554799\" style=\"width: 970px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"lazyload wp-image-1554799 size-full-width\" src=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-36-Frank-Lloyd-Wright-An-Important-Double-Pedestal-Lamp-for-the-Susan-Lawrence-Dana-House-Springfield-Illinois-Estimate-3000000\u20135000000.jpg?quality=80&amp;w=970\" alt=\"A geometric, iridescent glass and bronze table lamp with a pyramid-shaped roof and four pedestal legs, designed by Frank Lloyd Wright.\" width=\"970\" height=\"647\" srcset=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-36-Frank-Lloyd-Wright-An-Important-Double-Pedestal-Lamp-for-the-Susan-Lawrence-Dana-House-Springfield-Illinois-Estimate-3000000\u20135000000.jpg 8996w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-36-Frank-Lloyd-Wright-An-Important-Double-Pedestal-Lamp-for-the-Susan-Lawrence-Dana-House-Springfield-Illinois-Estimate-3000000\u20135000000.jpg?resize=300,200 300w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-36-Frank-Lloyd-Wright-An-Important-Double-Pedestal-Lamp-for-the-Susan-Lawrence-Dana-House-Springfield-Illinois-Estimate-3000000\u20135000000.jpg?resize=768,512 768w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-36-Frank-Lloyd-Wright-An-Important-Double-Pedestal-Lamp-for-the-Susan-Lawrence-Dana-House-Springfield-Illinois-Estimate-3000000\u20135000000.jpg?resize=635,424 635w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-36-Frank-Lloyd-Wright-An-Important-Double-Pedestal-Lamp-for-the-Susan-Lawrence-Dana-House-Springfield-Illinois-Estimate-3000000\u20135000000.jpg?resize=1536,1024 1536w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-36-Frank-Lloyd-Wright-An-Important-Double-Pedestal-Lamp-for-the-Susan-Lawrence-Dana-House-Springfield-Illinois-Estimate-3000000\u20135000000.jpg?resize=2048,1366 2048w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-36-Frank-Lloyd-Wright-An-Important-Double-Pedestal-Lamp-for-the-Susan-Lawrence-Dana-House-Springfield-Illinois-Estimate-3000000\u20135000000.jpg?resize=970,647 970w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-36-Frank-Lloyd-Wright-An-Important-Double-Pedestal-Lamp-for-the-Susan-Lawrence-Dana-House-Springfield-Illinois-Estimate-3000000\u20135000000.jpg?resize=320,213 320w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-36-Frank-Lloyd-Wright-An-Important-Double-Pedestal-Lamp-for-the-Susan-Lawrence-Dana-House-Springfield-Illinois-Estimate-3000000\u20135000000.jpg?resize=1920,1281 1920w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-36-Frank-Lloyd-Wright-An-Important-Double-Pedestal-Lamp-for-the-Susan-Lawrence-Dana-House-Springfield-Illinois-Estimate-3000000\u20135000000.jpg?resize=50,33 50w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 300px, 620px\"\/><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"lazyload wp-image-1554799 size-full-width\" src=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-36-Frank-Lloyd-Wright-An-Important-Double-Pedestal-Lamp-for-the-Susan-Lawrence-Dana-House-Springfield-Illinois-Estimate-3000000\u20135000000.jpg?quality=80&amp;w=970\" alt=\"A geometric, iridescent glass and bronze table lamp with a pyramid-shaped roof and four pedestal legs, designed by Frank Lloyd Wright.\" width=\"970\" height=\"647\" srcset=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-36-Frank-Lloyd-Wright-An-Important-Double-Pedestal-Lamp-for-the-Susan-Lawrence-Dana-House-Springfield-Illinois-Estimate-3000000\u20135000000.jpg 8996w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-36-Frank-Lloyd-Wright-An-Important-Double-Pedestal-Lamp-for-the-Susan-Lawrence-Dana-House-Springfield-Illinois-Estimate-3000000\u20135000000.jpg?resize=300,200 300w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-36-Frank-Lloyd-Wright-An-Important-Double-Pedestal-Lamp-for-the-Susan-Lawrence-Dana-House-Springfield-Illinois-Estimate-3000000\u20135000000.jpg?resize=768,512 768w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-36-Frank-Lloyd-Wright-An-Important-Double-Pedestal-Lamp-for-the-Susan-Lawrence-Dana-House-Springfield-Illinois-Estimate-3000000\u20135000000.jpg?resize=635,424 635w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-36-Frank-Lloyd-Wright-An-Important-Double-Pedestal-Lamp-for-the-Susan-Lawrence-Dana-House-Springfield-Illinois-Estimate-3000000\u20135000000.jpg?resize=1536,1024 1536w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-36-Frank-Lloyd-Wright-An-Important-Double-Pedestal-Lamp-for-the-Susan-Lawrence-Dana-House-Springfield-Illinois-Estimate-3000000\u20135000000.jpg?resize=2048,1366 2048w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-36-Frank-Lloyd-Wright-An-Important-Double-Pedestal-Lamp-for-the-Susan-Lawrence-Dana-House-Springfield-Illinois-Estimate-3000000\u20135000000.jpg?resize=970,647 970w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-36-Frank-Lloyd-Wright-An-Important-Double-Pedestal-Lamp-for-the-Susan-Lawrence-Dana-House-Springfield-Illinois-Estimate-3000000\u20135000000.jpg?resize=320,213 320w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-36-Frank-Lloyd-Wright-An-Important-Double-Pedestal-Lamp-for-the-Susan-Lawrence-Dana-House-Springfield-Illinois-Estimate-3000000\u20135000000.jpg?resize=1920,1281 1920w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Lot-36-Frank-Lloyd-Wright-An-Important-Double-Pedestal-Lamp-for-the-Susan-Lawrence-Dana-House-Springfield-Illinois-Estimate-3000000\u20135000000.jpg?resize=50,33 50w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 300px, 620px\"\/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-1554799\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Lot 36, Frank Lloyd Wright\u2019s <em>An Important Double-Pedestal Lamp for the Susan Lawrence Dana House, Springfield, Illinois s<\/em>old for $7.5 million. <span class=\"media-credit\">Sotheby&#8217;s<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>In the final stretch of the sale, both <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/person\/henry-moore\/\" title=\"Henry Moore\" class=\"company-link\">Henry Moore<\/a> sculptures landed within estimate: <i>Mother and Child on Ladderback Chair<\/i> brought in $523,400, while <i>Seated Woman on Bench<\/i> sold in-room for a modest $482,600. Meanwhile, momentum appears to be building around another British sculptor, <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/person\/lynn-chadwick\/\" title=\"Lynn Chadwick\" class=\"company-link\">Lynn Chadwick<\/a>. With Perrotin recently staging a slate of <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/2024\/10\/exhibition-lynn-chadwick-hypercircle-galerie-perrotin\/\">major exhibitions beginning in Paris during Art Basel<\/a>, the final lot of the night\u2014<i>Three Elektras<\/i>, one of the largest Chadwick works ever brought to auction\u2014closed the sale on a high note, hammering at $2,002,000, well above its $1.2-1.8 million estimate.<\/p>\n<h3>A tense night at Phillips delivers records with women artists shining<\/h3>\n<p>Opening the evening earlier at 5 p.m., <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/company\/phillips\/\" title=\"Phillips\" class=\"company-link\">Phillips<\/a> launched the week\u2019s sales with a noticeably cautious tone. In a market where the once-reliable lure of youthful, fresh paint has lost momentum\u2014at least in evening sales\u2014the house leaned more heavily on established, blue-chip names for its <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.phillips.com\/auction\/NY010825\">Modern and Contemporary Evening Sale<\/a>. Even so, the auction house managed to deliver a surprisingly confident result, bolstered by the fact that 90 percent of the lots were either fresh to market or hadn\u2019t appeared at auction in more than 15 years. The sale achieved a total of $51,952,350 across thirty-six lots, after four were withdrawn and another four went unsold.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_1554803\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1554803\" style=\"width: 970px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"lazyload wp-image-1554803 size-full-width\" src=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Hartigan-The-Fourth-1.jpg?quality=80&amp;w=970\" alt=\"A large abstract painting composed of bold, gestural brushstrokes in black, blue, red, green, and purple over a mostly unpainted canvas background.\" width=\"970\" height=\"529\" srcset=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Hartigan-The-Fourth-1.jpg 5617w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Hartigan-The-Fourth-1.jpg?resize=300,163 300w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Hartigan-The-Fourth-1.jpg?resize=768,419 768w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Hartigan-The-Fourth-1.jpg?resize=635,346 635w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Hartigan-The-Fourth-1.jpg?resize=1536,837 1536w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Hartigan-The-Fourth-1.jpg?resize=2048,1116 2048w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Hartigan-The-Fourth-1.jpg?resize=970,529 970w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Hartigan-The-Fourth-1.jpg?resize=320,174 320w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Hartigan-The-Fourth-1.jpg?resize=1920,1046 1920w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Hartigan-The-Fourth-1.jpg?resize=50,27 50w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 300px, 620px\"\/><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"lazyload wp-image-1554803 size-full-width\" src=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Hartigan-The-Fourth-1.jpg?quality=80&amp;w=970\" alt=\"A large abstract painting composed of bold, gestural brushstrokes in black, blue, red, green, and purple over a mostly unpainted canvas background.\" width=\"970\" height=\"529\" srcset=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Hartigan-The-Fourth-1.jpg 5617w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Hartigan-The-Fourth-1.jpg?resize=300,163 300w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Hartigan-The-Fourth-1.jpg?resize=768,419 768w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Hartigan-The-Fourth-1.jpg?resize=635,346 635w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Hartigan-The-Fourth-1.jpg?resize=1536,837 1536w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Hartigan-The-Fourth-1.jpg?resize=2048,1116 2048w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Hartigan-The-Fourth-1.jpg?resize=970,529 970w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Hartigan-The-Fourth-1.jpg?resize=320,174 320w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Hartigan-The-Fourth-1.jpg?resize=1920,1046 1920w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Hartigan-The-Fourth-1.jpg?resize=50,27 50w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 300px, 620px\"\/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-1554803\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Grace Hartigan\u2019s <em>The Fourth <\/em>(1956) sold for $1,633,000. <span class=\"media-credit\">Jean Bourbon<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Leading the night at Phillips was <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/person\/jean-michel-basquiat\/\" title=\"Jean-Michel Basquiat\" class=\"company-link\">Jean-Michel Basquiat<\/a>\u2019s <i>Untitled<\/i>, originally acquired by Swiss dealer <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/person\/bruno-bischofberger\/\" title=\"Bruno Bischofberger\" class=\"company-link\">Bruno Bischofberger<\/a> and now offered from the personal collection of <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/person\/david-bowie\/\" title=\"David Bowie\" class=\"company-link\">David Bowie<\/a>. Opening at $3.8 million, the work landed at $5.4 million in the room ($6,594,000 with premium), exceeding its $4.5-6.5 million estimate. Another Basquiat work on paper from 1985\/1986 also outperformed expectations, selling for $2,964,000.<\/p>\n<p>Women artists shone throughout the evening, with Phillips strategically spotlighting new or historically overlooked names\u2014an approach that sparked regional bidding far beyond the U.S. That was the case with Colombian artist <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/person\/olga-de-amaral\/\" title=\"Olga de Amaral\" class=\"company-link\">Olga de Amaral<\/a>, who made her evening sale debut with an early piece from her <i>Images Perdidas<\/i> series, inspired by pre-Columbian weaving traditions and spiritual symbolism. Opening at $220,000, the work quickly attracted multiple bidders online and in the room, doubling its estimate in under three minutes. It ultimately hammered at $920,000 to a bidder in the room, setting a new auction record for the artist at $1.2 million with fees\u2014four times its $300,000-500,000 estimate. The result follows several years of mounting international interest in de Amaral\u2019s work, bolstered by her representation with Lisson Gallery and further consolidated by her <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/2024\/10\/review-olga-de-amaral-fondation-cartier\/\">major exhibition at Fondation Cartier in Paris<\/a>.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_1554804\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1554804\" style=\"width: 970px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"lazyload wp-image-1554804 size-full-width\" src=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/de-Amaral-Imagen-Perdida-27.jpg?quality=80&amp;w=970\" alt=\"A shimmering textile work made of gold and dark metallic elements, woven into a cascading mosaic pattern with a dense surface texture.\" width=\"970\" height=\"1907\" srcset=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/de-Amaral-Imagen-Perdida-27.jpg 2621w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/de-Amaral-Imagen-Perdida-27.jpg?resize=153,300 153w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/de-Amaral-Imagen-Perdida-27.jpg?resize=768,1510 768w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/de-Amaral-Imagen-Perdida-27.jpg?resize=305,600 305w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/de-Amaral-Imagen-Perdida-27.jpg?resize=781,1536 781w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/de-Amaral-Imagen-Perdida-27.jpg?resize=1041,2048 1041w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/de-Amaral-Imagen-Perdida-27.jpg?resize=970,1907 970w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/de-Amaral-Imagen-Perdida-27.jpg?resize=320,629 320w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/de-Amaral-Imagen-Perdida-27.jpg?resize=1920,3776 1920w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/de-Amaral-Imagen-Perdida-27.jpg?resize=25,50 25w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 300px, 620px\"\/><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"lazyload wp-image-1554804 size-full-width\" src=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/de-Amaral-Imagen-Perdida-27.jpg?quality=80&amp;w=970\" alt=\"A shimmering textile work made of gold and dark metallic elements, woven into a cascading mosaic pattern with a dense surface texture.\" width=\"970\" height=\"1907\" srcset=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/de-Amaral-Imagen-Perdida-27.jpg 2621w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/de-Amaral-Imagen-Perdida-27.jpg?resize=153,300 153w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/de-Amaral-Imagen-Perdida-27.jpg?resize=768,1510 768w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/de-Amaral-Imagen-Perdida-27.jpg?resize=305,600 305w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/de-Amaral-Imagen-Perdida-27.jpg?resize=781,1536 781w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/de-Amaral-Imagen-Perdida-27.jpg?resize=1041,2048 1041w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/de-Amaral-Imagen-Perdida-27.jpg?resize=970,1907 970w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/de-Amaral-Imagen-Perdida-27.jpg?resize=320,629 320w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/de-Amaral-Imagen-Perdida-27.jpg?resize=1920,3776 1920w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/de-Amaral-Imagen-Perdida-27.jpg?resize=25,50 25w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 300px, 620px\"\/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-1554804\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Olga de Amaral\u2019s <em>Imagen perdida<\/em> (1996) soared to four times its estimate at $1.2 million. <span class=\"media-credit\">Bonnie H Morrison<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Another standout was Austrian artist <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/person\/kiki-kogelnik\/\" title=\"Kiki Kogelnik\" class=\"company-link\">Kiki Kogelnik<\/a>, who made her auction debut with a 1973 painting\u2014the same year as her first exhibition in Austria. Opening at $85,000, the lot quickly climbed to $280,000 amid active international bidding online and over the phones, ultimately closing at a record $355,600 with fees.<\/p>\n<p>The night also delivered a new record for <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/person\/grace-hartigan\/\" title=\"Grace Hartigan\" class=\"company-link\">Grace Hartigan<\/a>, a long-overlooked and now rightly reassessed female force within Abstract Expressionism. <i>The Forth<\/i>, a large-scale, animated abstraction from 1959, hit the rostrum with authority. Described in the catalogue as \u201can explosive convergence of American identity, postwar ambition and painterly force,\u201d the fourteen-foot-wide canvas opened at $400,000 and soared to $1.3 million after ten minutes of spirited bidding ($1,633,000 with premium). The work came with distinguished provenance, having once belonged to banker, philanthropist and former U.S. Ambassador to Belgium William A. M. Burden Jr., who exhibited it in Brussels the following year through the U.S. State Department\u2019s Art in Embassies program, which placed works by leading American artists in diplomatic residences abroad. Last sold at Christie\u2019s in 1997 for just $24,000, the painting more than doubled its $600,000 low estimate and marked an 18 percent jump over Hartigan\u2019s previous record, set by <i>Early November<\/i> (1959), which sold for $1.38 million at Christie\u2019s on May 12, 2022. Could this finally signal Hartigan\u2014youngest of the Ab-Ex circle\u2014is on course to join the market rise of Joan Mitchell and <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/2024\/11\/who-was-painter-helen-frankenthaler\/\">Helen Frankenthaler<\/a>?<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_1554808\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1554808\" style=\"width: 970px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"lazyload wp-image-1554808 size-full-width\" src=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Kogelnick_Rainy.jpg?quality=80&amp;w=970\" alt=\"A stylized painting of a woman walking with an umbrella in a rainstorm, set against a gradient pink and purple sky, rendered in flat, bright colors.\" width=\"970\" height=\"1285\" srcset=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Kogelnick_Rainy.jpg 3000w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Kogelnick_Rainy.jpg?resize=226,300 226w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Kogelnick_Rainy.jpg?resize=768,1017 768w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Kogelnick_Rainy.jpg?resize=453,600 453w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Kogelnick_Rainy.jpg?resize=1160,1536 1160w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Kogelnick_Rainy.jpg?resize=1546,2048 1546w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Kogelnick_Rainy.jpg?resize=970,1285 970w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Kogelnick_Rainy.jpg?resize=320,424 320w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Kogelnick_Rainy.jpg?resize=1920,2543 1920w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Kogelnick_Rainy.jpg?resize=38,50 38w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 300px, 620px\"\/><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"lazyload wp-image-1554808 size-full-width\" src=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Kogelnick_Rainy.jpg?quality=80&amp;w=970\" alt=\"A stylized painting of a woman walking with an umbrella in a rainstorm, set against a gradient pink and purple sky, rendered in flat, bright colors.\" width=\"970\" height=\"1285\" srcset=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Kogelnick_Rainy.jpg 3000w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Kogelnick_Rainy.jpg?resize=226,300 226w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Kogelnick_Rainy.jpg?resize=768,1017 768w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Kogelnick_Rainy.jpg?resize=453,600 453w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Kogelnick_Rainy.jpg?resize=1160,1536 1160w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Kogelnick_Rainy.jpg?resize=1546,2048 1546w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Kogelnick_Rainy.jpg?resize=970,1285 970w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Kogelnick_Rainy.jpg?resize=320,424 320w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Kogelnick_Rainy.jpg?resize=1920,2543 1920w, https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Kogelnick_Rainy.jpg?resize=38,50 38w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 300px, 620px\"\/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-1554808\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Kiki Kogelnik\u2019s <em>Rainy<\/em> (1973) sold for $355,600. <span class=\"media-credit\">Phillips<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>A new record was also set last night at Phillips for another Colombian contemporary artist, <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/person\/ilana-savdie\/\" title=\"Ilana Savdie\" class=\"company-link\">Ilana Savdie<\/a>, who has been making her New York debut with White Cube since the gallery announced her representation in 2023. The vibrant hues and layered textures of her <i>Imperial diet, y otros demonios<\/i> (2021), opening at $80,000\u2014more aligned with her primary market pricing\u2014sparked a fierce contest between online and phone bidders, culminating in a showdown between a bidder in Lebanon and another in Austin. The latter ultimately secured the work for $228,600, setting a new auction record for the rising artist.<\/p>\n<p>The opening lot, a painting by Japanese artist <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/person\/yu-nishimura\/\" title=\"Yu Nishimura\" class=\"company-link\">Yu Nishimura<\/a>, fell short of his recent high of $296,100 set at Sotheby\u2019s this past February, hammering after a few muted bids at $220,000 ($279,400 with fees), despite the buzz surrounding <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/2025\/05\/artist-yu-nishimura-joins-david-zwirner-gallery\/\">his addition to David Zwirner\u2019s roster<\/a>. Perhaps a sign the market isn\u2019t ready to sustain a meteoric ascent when prices stray too far, too fast from the primary range. <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/person\/james-turrell\/\" title=\"James Turrell\" class=\"company-link\">James Turrell<\/a>, by contrast, set a new record at Phillips with <i>Ariel<\/i> from his ongoing <i>Glass Series<\/i>, which hammered at $520,000 ($660,400 with fees), marking the Light and Space pioneer\u2019s Evening Sale debut.<\/p>\n<p>Some of the evening\u2019s most anticipated lots just scraped past their low estimates. <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/person\/ed-ruscha\/\" title=\"Ed Ruscha\" class=\"company-link\">Ed Ruscha<\/a>\u2019s <i>Alvarado to Doheny<\/i> sold after a few limp bids for $4.9 million with fees\u2014likely to its guarantor, via the house\u2019s head of private sales. Lot 16, <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/person\/gerhard-richter\/\" title=\"Gerhard Richter\" class=\"company-link\">Gerhard Richter<\/a>\u2019s portrait of <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/person\/sigmar-polke\/\" title=\"Sigmar Polke\" class=\"company-link\">Sigmar Polke<\/a>\u2014once in the collection of <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/person\/blinky-palermo\/\" title=\"Blinky PAlermo\" class=\"company-link\">Blinky PAlermo<\/a>\u2014similarly hovered at its threshold, selling for $4,174,000 after a slow rise from a $2.3 million opening bid, with Phillips\u2019s global chairman ultimately taking it home.<\/p>\n<p>But the night\u2019s most visibly rattled moment came with <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/person\/richard-prince\/\" title=\"Richard Prince\" class=\"company-link\">Richard Prince<\/a>\u2019s <i>Killer Nurse<\/i>. As auctioneer <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/person\/henry-highley\/\" title=\"Henry Highley\" class=\"company-link\">Henry Highley<\/a> approached the lot, he was handed a note that visibly threw him off balance\u2014something had gone awry. A bidder may have backed out or retracted a commitment. After a tense few minutes of \u201cdialing for info,\u201d the work finally hammered at $2.6 million, shortly after Highley, with forced cheer, relayed a \u201cgreat message from private sales\u201d that appeared to salvage the situation, bringing the final price just over the low estimate at $3,206,000 with fees.<\/p>\n<p>Still, the tension lingered, and Highley struggled to fully recover his rhythm. Although the Thiebaud cake found a home (selling for just short of its low estimate at $1,270,000 to <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/p\/DJnjWSGM2vd\/?igsh=dDY2N3UxeHZ6Y2t1\">Korean dealer and collector Hong Gyu Shin<\/a>), most of the final lots were passes\u2014including a seminal Frank Stella from the 1970s, a gilded mirror by Jeff Koons and a Richard Prince from his <i>Cowboy<\/i> series.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"2137\" data-end=\"2954\"><strong>The May auction marathon continues tonight with Christie\u2019s <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.christies.com\/auction\/21st-century-evening-sale--23455-nyr\" rel=\"noopener\">21st Century Evening Sale<\/a>\u00a0and tomorrow with <a href=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/company\/sothebys-2\/\" title=\"Sotheby\u2019s\" class=\"company-link\">Sotheby\u2019s<\/a> <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sothebys.com\/en\/buy\/auction\/2025\/contemporary-evening-auction\" rel=\"noopener\">The Now and Contemporary Evening Auction<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" src=\"https:\/\/observer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/05\/Oliver-Barker-Sothebys-Modern-Evening-Auction.-Brendon-Cook_BFA.com-2.jpg?quality=80&amp;w=970\" alt=\"At Sotheby\u2019s, a $70M Giacometti Fails to Sell While Works By Munch and C\u00e9zanne Ignite Buyer Excitement\" style=\"display:none;width:0;\"\/><\/p><\/div>\n<p><script>\n\t!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)\n\t{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?\n\t\tn.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};\n\t\tif(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';\n\t\tn.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;\n\t\tt.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];\n\t\ts.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script',\n\t\t'https:\/\/connect.facebook.net\/en_US\/fbevents.js');\n\tfbq('init', '618909876214345');\n\tfbq('track', 'PageView');\n<\/script><script async src=\"\/\/www.instagram.com\/embed.js\"><\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sotheby\u2019s Modern Evening Auction saw a headline lot by Giacometti falter dramatically, casting a shadow over an otherwise solid $186.4 million result. Brendon Cook\/BFA.com If the prevailing art market mantra in recent months has been that, while buyers may be more selective, true quality will always sell, then what unfolded last night at Sotheby\u2019s Modern [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":6707,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6706","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-usa-news"],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6706","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6706"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6706\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6708,"href":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6706\/revisions\/6708"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6707"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6706"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6706"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nationalgunowner.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6706"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}